What is legal; what is right; what is your standard?
These are questions that most people don’t ask themselves, or they don’t take a close look at.
Let us assume we are living 150 years ago in the United States. We are in some mid-west town. If someone came and stole your daughter, that person committed kidnapping, has he not? In this point of time, under the laws of the United States, when that person is found, he would be hung, as kidnapping was a capital punishment. If were in a confrontation with this person, you would have the right to kill the criminal in order to secure your child. You would have the backing of society, the police and the government.
Again, 150 years ago, if you were travelling down the road in your wagon, and you were stopped by some men who forced you to the side of the road; found money that you were carrying, and took it, saying, “He’s got a lot of money, let’s take it.” This would be robbery, as we all know. If, after they turned around to leave, you pulled you trusty Colt Navy revolver from under your seat, and told them to stop. When they pulled their guns, you shot and killed them first, you would be in the right, and society would be in back of you. Why? Because, at this time, the law of the land was, if someone robbed you, it was called stealing, which you had a right to prevent. Also, with them treating your life, you have an equal right to kill them.
In both of the two above examples, if the criminals gave you an excuse for why they are doing it, their criminal act would still be wrong.
Now, you are transported to 1999. You are at home, and the police comes with a social worker to take your daughter because an anonymous caller said that you are abusing the child. They take your child in custody for, and lock you up. You go to court, after a wait of two months, and it was found that the charges are unsubstantiated, and they release the child to you. Now, this is mild, considering what thousands of others have gone through, where they put children into a foster home for two years.
You don’t like what happened; try to fight it in court; and finally resign yourself to the fact that this is the law, though you don’t like it.
One day you are driving down the road and the state police stopped you. They have “probable cause” to search your car; in it, they discover a brief case with $60,000. You explain to them that you sold a home in one state, and took your money in cash to your home state. They do not care, as the law says that anyone who has a “lot” of money on them has to go to court to prove where they got it. As the government’s “war on drugs” large amounts of money is suspicious of drug dealing.
In first example, the State says it’s not kidnapping, as there are laws on the books stating such circumstances where they can take your child. In the second example, the State says it’s not stealing, as according to law, they can do this. Since there are laws that say this; since politicians make such laws; since policemen carry out such laws; since society, in general, support such laws; does it make it right? If you agree with what society does, at least in the above two examples, then that means you have no standard, no system of right and wrong, and probably, no religious beliefs. So, you might as well join the crowd and be obedient servants to your master. If you don’t go along with what is happening, then you have a standard of right and wrong.
Now, if someone who tried to defend their child from kidnapping, and killed the policeman and social worker, many people would say how horrible that is, even those who claim they are Christian, and are against what is happening. These people may go by the name of conservative, or have a Christian label, such a Christian Reconstructionist, etc. But, are they right in condemning this person? No! Likewise, if someone killed the state police who tried to steal their money while travelling on the road, these same people, and even those who call themselves Patriots, could join in chorus with the Judeo-Christians, whom we know are really in left-field, as being wrong. If no defensive action was take against the police, they look at the police and government as doing wrong. But if the victim defended himself, his loved ones, or his property, they look at that person for doing wrong. This is called hypocrisy, or as the Bible says, he’s a double minded person, and a double minded person is unstable in all his ways.
The conservative response would be to take them to court; to petition the government; to demonstrate, etc. Well, what good is that when the violence has already been committed? It’s too late. Also, they have look at history. For decades, conservatives, patriots and racialists have done just this, and what has happened? We continue to see more and more laws that take away our freedoms—they are getting stronger, and we are getting weaker. In short, we can never win by their rules. Oh, sure, there are some isolated cases we have won, but that’s just it, they are isolated. In short, we will never win by playing by the criminals’ rules.
It’s just like dialling “911” when we are being attacked by a killer—it’s too late. But many do this, because to defend yourself at the time you need it, not 30 minutes later, or even one minute later, is too late. But a lot of people do this, because to have a gun on your person while walking down the street, much less using it, is illegal.
If a criminal had a sheriff’s badge on 150 years ago, but did that which you knew was illegal, would that make it right? No! The same applies today. A criminal covering up who he really is by having a badge, showing papers, or having a uniform, does not change a criminal act. In 1999, the method is a little different, but the same thing is happening. By taking what is criminal, and changing the law, by using legal sounding words, by politicians saying it is OK, does not make a wrong into a right. If President Lincoln said that dogs have five legs, does that make it so? So, too, if what was kidnapping 150 years ago, doesn’t make it OK now. If stealing money that is yours, doesn’t make it OK now, no matter what reason they give.
A society must have standards, and these standards must be based on truth. What good is a standard if it’s based on a lie. They might never change that standard, but if it’s evil, it’ll always will be evil. If the standard started on the truth, but it changed even by 1% every year, in 100 years it will be totally opposite of what it was when it started out. So, if one person accepts even a slight change from a standard, he’s no better than someone who accepts a total change, because one a change is accepted, it’s only a matter of time before it will keep changing. The only difference between the two is the degree.
Now, people may say, what is truth. If you read the Bible, Pontius Piolet said the same thing 2,000 years ago. Christ gave the answer elsewhere in the Bible, “I am the Truth, the Light…” In short, they are the laws that His Father gave in the Old Testament. And Christ said, “Study the scriptures to show yourself approved.” He was talking about the OT (there was no NT when He said). If one studies the Bible, you will see laws of what is kidnapping and stealing; that you have a right to defend yourself and even kill those who use force against you; that their is a death penalty for kidnapping, plus many other things.
When the US was founded, our laws were based, for the most part, on biblical laws. Just read old US laws, and biblical laws, and see how they parallel. This was also when we had the most freedom. We didn’t have government stealing children under the pretext of child abuse; we didn’t have innocent people have their money stolen because the police thought they had too much; we didn’t have murderers go free; and the 1,001 other crimes that plague our nation as we do today. In fact, if you think that biblical law has no part in today’s society, or don’t even think that they helped anyone. Then just consider this. If the Bible is just a history book (some think not even a good one at that), tell me, why do we have the plagues on our nation like God promised when we disobey Him (read the 25th chapter of Deuteronomy). We have got exactly what was prophesised 3,500 years ago. In short, their is a cause and effect relationship. A person or a nation can be ignorant of it, but it will still effect them, regardless. It’s like two people jumping off a building. One can be ignorant of the law of gravity, and the other can be fully aware of it, but the effects will be the same on both. God made this law and the principles that apply to it. You either work within those laws, or those laws will break you.
One hundred and fifty years ago, society, more or less, was governed by good people. Now it’s governed by criminals. Naturally, the criminals are not going to say that they are thieves, murderers, kidnappers, enslavers of men. As good people have taken a back seat, and criminals have risen to the top, they have got billions of dollars, and with this, they have changed what is called right and wrong (Isaha said, “Woe unto those who call good evil, and evil good,” and convinced society that what they are doing is right, and anyone acting against them are the criminals. But like I said about the dog with five legs, just because they said so, doesn’t make it right. So, when the time comes that you have to defend your family and home, don’t worry about what others may think, you know that you are doing right. Sure, it’s more dangerous defending yourself, since you can’t depend on society for back up as people did 150 years ago, plus you have more criminal to fight, but it’s either them or you. And if they don’t kill you, you can rot in jail with a bunch of niggers.
If you were being shot at by a mafia member, you’d shot back. If there were 10 of them, you’d still shot back. Naturally, you don’t like the prospects, but if you know you are going to get killed, you’d still fight regardless of the number. No one likes having to be in a situation where you have to shoot a person who’s shooting at you, and 10 make it worse. If a large number of mafia members were shooting at you, and they had uniforms on, and said this is our law, that doesn’t change the fact that they are trying to kill you, take away your freedom, your property, etc. You should still try to kill them. Well, today, we are surrounded by much, much, more than 10 criminals. It’s a bad situation, but the fact is, they are still criminals.
It doesn’t matter if they don’t see themselves as criminals or not. This doesn’t change what they are doing, or the harm they intend to inflict on you or your family. Just like the common criminal, many of them sincerely don’t see themselves as criminals, so that means we shouldn’t defend ourselves? Sure, there are many cops and politicians who are good fathers, husbands and sons—or mothers, wives, daughters, as the case may be. But that isn’t an excuse to let them steal your daughter, take your money, put you in prison, etc. Again, Yahweh, God said, don’t be a respecter or persons. And this is the problem we have today. To many people respect these criminals, because they have a uniform on, their a politician, a businessman, etc. Even mafia members treat their wives and mothers good. So, saying he is a good family man is no excuse.
For those saying they are doing their jobs. Of course they are doing their jobs, but is their job doing good for the people are harm? Do they work for the devil or God? So this is no excuse.
I had been in the right-wing/patriotic movement for a number of years when I heard someone say that cops are not much better than criminals, and should be viewed as such. I had a hard time accepting this. In fact, I didn’t. Though I was politically and racially aware, it was still too hard for me to accept that those in power, whether they be businessmen, politicians, those on the judiciary, and policemen should be looked at as criminals (naturally, not all, but in general). I think this is true with most people in the right-wing. Why? Because, we have been brought up all our lives being told that these are people we can rely on; we can trust. Then to say that most of them are no good, takes away a solid foundation of our beliefs. For, it is human nature to trust others, and when this is taken away, what do we support our beliefs in.
This is the problem with telling others the truth—we don’t replace with another foundation they can rely on. I had only learned this, when I was taught about Identity. That there are people, and the God of the Bible does support what we are doing. So, I was like a man on a stone in the middle of a raging river—I had another stone on which to place my feet. And this is what we have to make sure our people have, when we tell them what is really going on. Don’t show only the problems, but the solutions; not just the bad people, but the good ones, too. By doing this, it will always give the other person a solid foundation on which to walk. But keep in mind, and don’t expect that person to take a leap to the next “stone,” as what you have just told him/her has to be tested. After all, they have been told one thing for their whole lives, and expecting them to make a change quickly is beyond reason. So, the same things applies with what I just have told you. I don’t expect people to believe it, or if they do, to do so quickly.
Another factor in me viewing those in power in a different light, was after reading and hearing more and more horror stories of what is happening to our people, have I viewed those in power with utter disgust.
On “touch stone” to determine if something is good or bad for the people is, if everyone did it, would it be good or bad? For example, if everyone who had their money stolen from them from the police, shot them, maybe not right then, but at a later time and place when you’ll have more success, would this be good or bad? Just think about it, if this happened, how many policemen would be willing thieves doing the stealing on the orders of others? Not very many. Thus, a bad law will be taken off the books, or at least, not enforced. If you say, people will get killed. Sure. There would be bad people, i.g., the policemen, and; there will be some Christian-Patriots. Let’s face it, it’s a war, and with a war, good and bad people get killed. If you say, what good is it if patriots get killed. I say, what good is it if they are locked in prison? What good is it if they are sitting quietly in their own little room, keeping their thoughts to themselves, afraid to even mention anything, because of the “thought crimes” in force.
So what can the System do, threaten you with eternal life? Unfortunately, good people have to die before other wake up, and if they don’t, they don’t deserve their freedom. Thus, all evil people will be living on Earth, and good people will be living in Heaven. Remember the words of Thomas Jefferson: “The tree of Liberty has to be watered from time to time with the blood of Patriots and Traitors.” In other words, liberty can only be secured when Patriots kill Traitors, and in this war, there will be Patriots killed, just like in the Revolutionary War.
We can read in history about evil government, but this only comes after that government is no longer in power. When they are in power, you will never hear from the government how bad they are. They always look at themselves as good. You will never hear it from those in business who make money from the evil system, nor from the media or educational system who depend on their existence from such a government. Most people who live under such a government will also support it, if for no other reason than they believe what they are told. This only comes out from the few Patriots who live at that time, or from a future government, or one in another country. This is the history of the world. And the only time a good government comes to power is when there are enough Patriots to be willing to defend themselves against such tyranny. That means killing those in power.
It has also been recorded in history that the governments of the world has kill more people than all the criminals in the world. In fact, many individual nations have killed more, such as: the former Soviet Union, East Germany, Romania, and the current government of Communist China. Why were they able to do this? Because there wasn’t enough people to kill those who were doing the killing. If more had done so, Communism would have the blood of nearly 200 million more people would have been alive.